The Equal Parent Presumption: Social Justice in the Legal Determination of Parenting after Divorce
Subyek
: Custody of children, Children of divorced parents – Legal
status, laws, Divorce – Law and legislation, Parent and child
(Law), Parenting, Social justice, equal parenting
Penerbit
: McGill-Queen's University Press
Ringkasan :The focus of this book is parenting after divorce and the best
interests of children, in situations in which both parents are seeking
to exclusively parent their children or are otherwise in conflict
in regard to parenting after divorce. As such, the book will be of
interest not only to divorce practitioners, policy-makers, academicians,
and students, but also to parents themselves. After more
than twenty-five years of studying the highly contentious issue of
“child custody,” my conclusion is that children of divorce will fare
best if they are able to reside with each of their parents in an equal
parenting arrangement, and that this key principle should be
established as a presumption in law, and as fundamental to children’s
best interests and well-being. In the context of divorce,
“equal parenting” may be defined along three dimensions:
1 Equality of power and influence such that neither party is
able to control the other or is in a submissive position to the
other, so that the faculty of free consent may be fully exercised
by each parent. Equality of opportunity to actively
parent
is a key element in this regard.
2 Equality of the proportion of residential time spent by each
parent with the child after divorce relative to the amount of
time each parent spent with the child prior to divorce.
3 Equality of residential time spent with the child after divorce
relative to the other parent (50% time division). I will discuss how these three dimensions of gender equality
are commensurate with a child-focused “best-interests-of-thechild-
from-the-perspective-of-the-child” approach to the legal
determination
of child custody after divorce, and with a
“responsibility-
to-needs” approach to parenting after divorce.
In addition, I argue that the state has a fiduciary obligation to
enable arrangements for healthy parenting after divorce. In this
regard, the standard of living in all households in which a child
resides should be sufficient to allow the child to have his or her
essential needs met, ideally through the active parenting of both
parents. The ongoing, direct involvement of parents in children’s
lives is vitally important to their well-being; the need for roots
(Weil 1943) and family connectedness are the most neglected
needs among children in contemporary society, and especially so
in an era of new genetic technologies and redefinitions of “parent”
in family law (Somerville 2006). Prevailing social policy in
the Canadian child welfare field, including child protection and
child care as well as child custody law and policy, serves largely
to disconnect children from their families of origin (Neufeld and
Mate 2004; Kruk 2011).
Daftar copy :
No. |
Barcode |
Lokasi |
No. Rak |
Ketersediaan |
1 |
00131626 |
Perpustakaan Pusat |
|
TIDAK DIPINJAMKAN |
Diproses dalam : 0.15158414840698 detik