Long Wars and the Constitution
Penulis
: Stephen M. Griffin
Subyek
: War and emergency powers—United States, United States—
Foreign relations, National Security State
Penerbit
: Harvard University Press
Ringkasan :IN THE AFTERMATH of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, the
American constitutional system was shaken by a series of controversies
arising out of the aggressive response of the Bush administration. Prominent
among these were furious and deeply felt disputes over the use of
torture in interrogation, the treatment of detainees, especially at Guantanamo
Bay, and domestic surveillance. The Bush administration came
under heavy criticism not only for actions initially taken in secret and
unauthorized by Congress, but also for the way it led the nation into the
authorized war against Iraq in 2003. Many Americans believed that the
war had been foisted on the public in a deceptive way without adequate
consideration of its costs. As a result of these controversies, President
George W. Bush was only the latest in a long line of chief executives
accused of acting as an “imperial” president.
The advent of the Obama administration did not lead to a stilling of
the waters. To an extent surprising to his supporters, President Barack
Obama did not break decisively with all of the controversial policies
of the Bush administration.1 This suggested a factor common to these
administrations was at work. The controversies that plagued the Bush
administration and the unwillingness of the Obama administration to
change those policies were the latest examples of a long chain of constitutional
diffi culties connected with the unilateral exercise of presidential
power in foreign affairs and, more specifi cally, the use of presidential
power to wage war.
Controversies over the use of executive power have existed throughout
American history. But they took on a completely new dimension
T following the enormous expansion in the capacities of government necessary
to prevail in World War II and the Cold War. Seen in this light, the
deeply problematic aspects of the Bush administration’s “war on terror”
belong to a family of constitutional crises that include Watergate in the
Nixon administration and the Iran-contra affair in the Reagan administration.
These crises are part of a pattern of recurrent policy disasters
and constitutional problems linked to the war power that run back to
the Truman administration and include both covert and overt military
operations such as the Bay of Pigs and the Vietnam War
Daftar copy :
No. |
Barcode |
Lokasi |
No. Rak |
Ketersediaan |
1 |
00131586 |
Perpustakaan Pusat |
|
TIDAK DIPINJAMKAN |
Diproses dalam : 0.15336298942566 detik