Commercial Agriculture, the Slave Trade and Slavery in Atlantic Africa
Penulis
: Robin Law and Suzanne Schwarz, and Silke Strickrod
Subyek
: The slave trade and commercial agriculture, legitimate commerce, agricultural produce
Ringkasan :This volume presents a selection of papers from a conference held at
the German Historical Institute London (GHIL), in September 2010,
on the topic of ‘Commercial Agriculture in Africa as an Alternative
to the SlaveTrade’.This Introduction begins by situating this topic in
its context within the history and historiography of western Africa.The idea of promoting the export of agricultural produce fromAfrica
first became central to European thought in the context of the
campaign to end the trans-Atlantic slave trade from the late eighteenth
century onwards, with actual projects on the ground inWest Africa
beginning with Danish attempts to establish plantations on the Gold
Coast (modern Ghana) from 1788, followed by the British2 colony of
Sierra Leone, after it was taken over by the Sierra Leone Company in
1791.3 After the legal abolition of the slave trade in the early nineteenth
century, proposed commercial alternatives to it became known
in contradistinction as ‘legitimate’ (or ‘legal’ or ‘lawful’) commerce (or trade).4 Strictly, the term ‘legitimate commerce’ designated trade in
anything other than slaves, including non-agricultural commodities
such as gold and ivory, but in practice interest was mainly concentrated
on the promotion of commercial agriculture.
Rationales for this interest in agricultural exports were various.
Most immediately, it was thought thatWest Africa could take the
place of the Americas as a supplier of sugar and other tropical products
to Europe, with African labour retained and employed locally
rather than being transported across the Atlantic, thereby dispensing
with the need for the trans-Atlantic slave trade: this was, for example,
the thinking behind the Danish project of 1788. Beyond this, there
was the desire to develop a form of trade which it was hoped would
be more beneficial to Africa itself, given that the impact of the slave
trade was commonly assumed to have been negative and destructive.
WilliamWilberforce, for example, proposing abolition of the
slave trade to the British Parliament in 1789, argued that the development
of alternative forms of trade to replace it would represent a
means of compensating for the harm which Europeans, through the
slave trade, had done to Africa: ‘Let us make reparation to Africa, as
far as we can, by establishing a trade upon true commercial principles.
Daftar copy :
No. |
Barcode |
Lokasi |
No. Rak |
Ketersediaan |
1 |
00131537 |
Perpustakaan Pusat |
|
TIDAK DIPINJAMKAN |
Diproses dalam : 0.14751100540161 detik